*O’madagain, C., Kachel, G., & Strickland, B (accepted). The Origin of Pointing: Evidence for the Touch Hypothesis. Science Advances.
Cova, F., Strickland, B. et al. (2018). Estimating the reproducibility of experimental philosophy. Review of Philosophy & Psychology. On-line before print.
Murez, M., Smortchkova, J., & Strickland, B. (in press). "The mental files theory of singular thought: A psychological perspective." in Singular Thought and Mental Files, R. Goodman, J. Genone et N. Kroll (editors), Oxford University Press.
Hafri, A., Trueswell, J., & Strickland, B. (2018). Encoding of event roles from visual scenes is rapid, spontaneous, and interacts with higher-level visual cognition. Cognition, 175, 35-52.
Strickland, B. & Chemla, E. (2018). Cross-linguistic regularities reflect core mechanics. PLOS ONE 1(18): e184132.
Kominsky*, J., Strickland *, B., Wertz, A., Elsner, C., Keil, F., & Wynn K. (2017). Categories and constraints in causal perception. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1649-1662. *joint first author.
Fisher, M., Knobe, J., Strickland, B., & Keil, F. (2017). The influence of social interaction on epistemic intuitions. Cognitive Science, 41(4), 1119-1134.
Strickland, B., Aristodemo, V., Kuhn, J., & Geraci, C. (2017). The categorical role of structurally iconic signs. BBS (commentary), 40, doi:10.1017/S0140525X15003076.
Helming, K., Strickland, B., & Jacob, P. (2016). A pragmatic approach to the puzzle about early belief ascription. Mind & Language, 31(4), 438-469.
Hafri, A., Trueswell, J., & Strickland, B. (2016). Extraction of event roles is from visual scenes is rapid, automatic, and interacts with-higher-level visual processing. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Philadelphia, PA.
Strickland, B. (2016). Language reflects "core" cognition: A new hypothesis about the origins of cross linguistic regularities. Cognitive Science, DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12332.
Strickland, B., Geraci, C., Chemla, E. Schlenker, P., Kelepir, M., & Pfau, R. (2015). Event representations constrain the structureof language: Sign language as a window into universally accessible linguistic biases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(19), 5968-5973.
Strickland, B., & Scholl, B. (2015). Visual perception involves event type representations: The case of containment vs. occlusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(3), 570-580.
Strickland, B., Fisher, M., Knobe, J., & Keil, F. (2014). Syntax and intentionality : An automatic link between between language and theory-of-mind. Cognition, 133(1), 249-261.
Peyroux, E., Strickland, B., Tapiero, I., & Franck, N. (2014). The intentionality bias in Schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 219(3), 426-430.
Helming, K., Strickland, B. & Jacob, P. (2014). Making sense of early false belief understanding. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(4), 167-170.
Strickland, B., & Mercier, M. (2014). Bias Neglect: A blindspot in the evaluation of scientific results. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(3), 570-580.
Strickland, B., & Suben, A. (2012). Experimenter philosophy: The problem of experimenter bias in experimental philosophy. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3(3), 457-467.
Strickland, B., Fisher, M., & Knobe, J. (2012). Moral structure falls out of event structure. Psychological Inquiry (commentary), 23, 198-205.
Mercier, H., & Strickland, B. (2012). Evaluating arguments from the reaction of the audience. Thinking & Reasoning, 18(3), 365-378.
Strickland, B., & Keil, F. (2011). Event completion : Event based inferences distort memory in a matter of seconds. Cognition 121(3), 409-415.
Strickland, B., Barrie, S., & Williams, R. (2011). Discourse structure and word learning. The Discourse of Social Achievement. Pragmatics and Society 2(2), 260-281.
Strickland, B., Fisher, M., Peyroux., E., Keil, F. (2011). Syntactic biases in intentionality judgments. Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual-Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Almor, A., Arunachalem, S., & Strickland, B. (2007). When the creampuff beat the boxer: Cost and function in reading metaphoric reference. Metaphor & Symbol. 22(2), 169-193.